Archive for the ‘Publication’ Category

Integrating Decision Options and Uncertainty of Commodity Price in the Project Evaluation (to be presented in 36th Indonesian Petroleum Association (IPA) conference, 24 May 2012 at 08.00 am, Nuri Room, Jakarta Convention Center)

Thursday, April 26th, 2012

The era of high uncertainty of commodity prices requires an economic reassessment of many natural resource projects.

Current conventional NPV analysis has a limitation in recognizing uncertainty during project life and some biased in its assumption, i.e.:

  1. It is assumed future cash flows to be certain to happen.
  2. Project risk does not change throughout its life
  3. It is assumed once the project is undertaken;  it will not be affected by any future managerial decision.

(more…)

Economic Evaluation on Bidding Proposals in the Tender of Oil and Gas Blocks (35th Indonesian Petroleum Association conference, May 2011)

Saturday, February 19th, 2011

(This article discusses how to determine the appropriate value of signature bonus and firm commitment in the bid proposal for block tender. This article had been presented in Indonesian Petroleum Association (IPA) Conference, session 15, date 19 May 2011 at 08.00 am, kakatua Room, Jakarta Convention Center)

(more…)

A New Era of Risk and Uncertainty Analysis in Project Valuation (The 25th Pan Pacific Congress of Appraisers, Valuers, and Counselors, Sept 2010, Bali)

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

This paper had been presented in the 25th Pan Pacific Congress of Real Estate Appraisers, Valuers, and Counselors (Session: Mining Asset/Extractive Industries Valuation).
Please see their website (www.ppc2010Bali.com)
(more…)

Utilizing Economic Modeling for Improved Decision Making in PSCs and Joint Venture Agreement (E&P Sharing Contract and Agreement, July 2010)

Friday, June 4th, 2010

we delivered  a topic:

Utilizing oil and gas economic modeling framework for evaluating upstream oil and gas assets to enhance accuracy in decision-making in PSCs, joint operations or mergers

For detail progamme and registration of this event, please see their website.

A New Era of Project Economics and Investment Decision Techniques, (MGEI/IAGI Luncheon Talk, November 2009, Jakarta)

Friday, November 20th, 2009

MGEI-IAGI is proudly arranging this luncheon talk that hopefully will enhance the valuation knowledge with the various techniques from conventional to modern methods for improved investment decision making.

This event will launch a book ” A New Era of Project Economics and Investment Decision Making – From conventional DCF to modern RO method” that recently published this month, written by Nuzulul Haq.

published-book-cover-update

For more information regarding this event, please contact:
IAGI Secretariat (attn. Bapak Sutar)
phone: 0811162476
fax: 021-83702848
email: iagisek@cbn.net.id

Advance Petroleum Economics for Making Decision in the High Volatile of Oil Price (33rd Indonesian Petroleum Association conference, May 2009)

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

-An Application of Dynamic DCF and Real Options Approach in the PSC Regime-

ABSTRACT

Petroleum valuation professionals have been actively investigating how to improve Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) valuation methods by better representing petroleum industry complexities in their cash flow models.

The focus of Dynamic DCF and Real Options (RO) methods is to asses the impact of the high uncertainty of oil price on the project value and risk. The difference in their approach to adjusting project cash flow for risk gives the different result of the project value.

This paper examines the valuation of oil field in the Indonesian PSC regime. Monte Carlo simulation is used to characterize the different exposures of the contractor and the government to the risky cash flow streams that they receive from the project. The results highlight that Monte Carlo simulation paired with the RO method is able to account appropriately for the differing exposures.

This paper makes the conclusion that RO is more likely to reveal a true picture of the worth of undeveloped reserves in Indonesia than other currently available technique. As such, it has the potential to form a proper basis for the negotiation of contract terms between the contractor and the Government of Indonesia, as a result of which development of the undeveloped reserves in Indonesia can be stimulated.

The Economics of Undeveloped Reserve in Indonesia in the Current Uncertain Oil Price (2nd Asian Conference of the International Association for Energy Economics, Perth, Western Australia, Nov 2008)

Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

- A case study of applying Least Squares Monte Carlo Method -

ABSTRACT

Indonesia has many potential undeveloped reserves and currently still depends on petroleum resources to support its economy. However, the economic criteria for investment decision making are still based on the traditional Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) that ignored the oil price volatility.

With the ability to value the uncertainty in the market (in this case is the oil price volatility) and the flexibility management to respond it, Real Option Valuation (ROV) is considered as the appropriate technique to value undeveloped reserve. The need for the ROV approach is essential for stimulating growth of oil and gas development in Indonesia.

After introduced in 2001 by Longstaff and Schwartz, the Least Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) Method had been extensively applied in natural resource industry (Sabour et al. 2006, Laughton et al. 2006). Since natural resource industry has multiple source of uncertainty from below and above ground factor, this methodology is suitable to be applied in this industry.

This paper examines the application of ROV to value undeveloped reserve in Indonesia using LSM Method. This paper will use a case study of PSC block and compare the result between forecast value from both methodologies (DCF and ROV).

This paper concludes that ROV can be applied to the Indonesian PSC regime. ROV is more likely to reveal a true picture of the worth of petroleum assets in Indonesia than any other currently available technique. As such, it has the potential to form a proper basis for investment decision making, as a result of which production of the undeveloped reserves in Indonesia can be stimulated

“Re-Invent” our Approach on the Economics of Petroleum Project for Improved Investment Decision Making (10th Symposium and Congress of Indonesian Society of Petroleum Engineer, Nov 2008)

Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

ABSTRACT

Harga minyak yang tinggi hingga menembus $100/barrel tidak pernah diperkirakan sebelumnya. Hal ini kembali menyadarkan kita bahwa apapun mungkin terjadi meski menurut kita itu tidak mungkin beberapa tahun yang lalu.

Banyaknya proyek perminyakan yang terlambat untuk berproduksi karena belum disepakatinya kontrak perjanjian antara berbagai pihak yang terlibat dikarenakan hasil perhitungan keekonomian yang belum memuaskan, mengakibatkan proyek-proyek tersebut tidak mendapatkan keuntungan atas tingginya harga minyak yang terjadi saat ini.

Fakta bahwa industri perminyakan menghadapi ketidakpastian yang tinggi dimasa depan seperti harga minyak tentunya harus dipertimbangkan oleh para praktisi didalam melakukan studi keekonomian suatu proyek Migas.

Perhitungan keekonomian dengan menggunakan pendekatan statis menyebabkan banyak keputusan investasi pada waktu itu didasarkan pada asumsi harga yang sangat konservatif.dan tidak memperhitungkan adanya volatilitas harga minyak ke depan. Hal ini menjadi salah satu sebab lambatnya keputusan investasi pada waktu itu.

Dalam teori keputusan investasi, perbedaan antara perhitungan net present value (NPV) tradisional dan Real Options adalah “timing of investment” dimana pada NPV tradisional peluang investasi adalah sekarang atau tidak sama sekali (now or never). Sebagai contoh kita akan tunda investasi jika nilai NPV kecil atau negatif. Tapi kebanyakan investasi bukan “now or never, Dalam beberapa kasus, kriteria NPV yang kecil, tidak cukup dijadikan faktor untuk memutuskan agar proyek ini ditunda.
Dalam teori real options, penundaan investasi bukan merupakan keputusan yang efektif selama nilai proyek tersebut lebih tinggi dari nilai thresholdnya. Nilai threshold inilah yang dapat diperoleh dari metode real option dengan mempertimbangkan adanya volatilitas harga minyak.

Tujuan makalah ini adalah untuk melihat kemungkinan aplikasi teori real option dalam membantu keputusan investasi dalam proyek perminyakan di Indonesia

Makalah ini menghasilkan beberapa kesimpulan diantaranya Real Option dapat diaplikasikan dalam perhitungan keekonomian proyek perminyakan di Indonesia, serta nilai yang dihasilkan dari metode ini lebih memperlihatkan nilai yang sebenarnya dari proyek tersebut dibandingkan dengan menggunakan metode NPV tradisional.

Using Real Options Analysis For PSC Contract Term Negotiation (32nd Indonesian Petroleum Association conference, May 2008)

Monday, May 12th, 2008

ABSTRACT

When Government opens the tender for some new PSC blocks, the government expect contractor to invest immediately for exploration activity and develop soon after getting a confirmation of commercial reserve. By the end Government expect the maximize revenue from those tender blocks for the benefit of Indonesia

In term of investment decision, a different between traditional net present values (NPV) analysis and real options analysis is the timing of investment. NPV analysis suggest that if the investment opportunity is “now or never”, invest now of NPV is positive. But most investments are not “now or never”, and in these cases an NPV greater than zero is not sufficient for immediate investment, option pricing theory tells us that, immediate investment is not optimal unless well head prices are higher than threshold price.

The objective of this paper is to examine how Real Options Analysis can help both government and contractor in analyzing the potential undeveloped reserves.

This paper extends a model by Paddock, Siegel and Smith (1988) to value undeveloped reserve in Indonesian PSC regime

This paper concludes that ROV can be applied to the Indonesian PSC regime to value undeveloped reserve in Indonesia. ROV is more likely to reveal a true picture of the worth of exploration potential and the value of undeveloped reserves in Indonesia than any other currently available technique. As such, it has the potential to form a proper basis for the negotiation of contract terms between the contractor and the Government of Indonesia, as a result of which development of the undeveloped reserves in Indonesia can be stimulated.

A Probabilistic Approach to Valuing Different Equity Interest in Multi Pay Exploration Prospects (31st Indonesian Petroleum Association conference, May 2007)

Saturday, May 12th, 2007

Abstract

The high costs and risks associated with many oil and gas exploration projects often cause companies to seek partners to share those costs and risks before embarking on major expenditure programs.

A previous study of farm out analysis for block X in Medco has been done using deterministic model (Kristiono, 2005). This further study was conducted to optimize farm-out analysis using probabilistic model. A risked economic evaluation of a two pay zone prospect i.e. Zone A and B in that block illustrates how probabilistic simulation modeling and deterministic valuation and risk analysis techniques combine to provide useful insight to economic evaluation of a farm out opportunity.

One of the significant advantages of probabilistic methods is their ability to quantify downside risk in more detail than deterministic calculations. Analysis of the negative values in the calculated EMV distributions from the probabilistic method can yield significant insight into the downside risk associated with a prospect.

This paper concluded that, there do appear to be farm-out terms that could be attractive to both parties i.e. Farminee pays between 60% and 70% of exploration well costs to earn a 50% working interest. However, If Medco is subject to capital constraints and under timer pressure to drill an obligation well it may accept farm-in terms with little or no promote to limit its financial exposure and down side risk.
Alternatively, the farminee may be prepared to accept less than optimal farm-in terms on this prospect in exchange for an interest in the upside potential of other possible prospects in the contract.